Lecture 1: The Comparative Approach to Exercise Physiology

43 slides

Slide 1

Title slide for E183 Exercise Physiology showing the subtitle "Comparative Perspectives in Exercise Physiology and Biomechanics" by Professor Monica A. Daley, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine. Background collage features photos of diverse animals including a lizard, frog, kangaroo, horse, fish, and a human runner.

  • This lecture introduces the course structure and key themes of E183 Exercise Physiology.
  • The course takes a comparative approach, examining exercise physiology across species rather than focusing solely on humans.
  • Professor Daley’s research background spans both human and comparative neuromechanics, informing this cross-species perspective.

Slide 2

Slide titled "Who am I?" showing Professor Daley's academic career path with logos and images: University of Utah (biology undergrad, pre-med), Harvard University (PhD in comparative locomotor biomechanics, neuromuscular function, human gross anatomy), School of Kinesiology (postdoc in bipedal gait models for bio-inspired robotics), and Royal Veterinary College (faculty for 12 years teaching comparative anatomy). Images of running animals and a human runner illustrate the comparative approach.

  • University of Utah — Biology undergrad; first research on interactions between running and breathing in humans.
  • Harvard University — PhD in comparative locomotor biomechanics; studied neuromuscular function in movement across terrestrial animals; also trained in human gross anatomy.
  • School of Kinesiology (postdoc) — Developed models of bipedal gait for bio-inspired robotics, exoskeletons.
  • Royal Veterinary College — Faculty for 12 years, led Comparative Neuromechanics lab and taught comparative anatomy and musculoskeletal biomechanics to veterinary students.
  • UC Irvine (2019–present) — Runs both the Human Neuromechanics Lab and the Comparative Neuromechanics Lab.

Slide 3

Screenshot of the UCI Center for Integrative Movement Sciences (CIMS) website. The header reads "We discover fundamental principles of movement that drive innovations in technology, medicine, and rehabilitation." A photo shows a dancer in motion.

  • Professor Daley directs the Center for Integrative Movement Sciences (CIMS) at UCI.
  • CIMS is an interdisciplinary group spanning Biology, Engineering, the School of Arts (Dance), and the School of Medicine.
  • The center focuses on fundamental principles of movement with applications in technology, medicine, and rehabilitation.
  • CIMS runs a summer research program for undergraduates interested in movement science research.

Slide 4

Screenshot of the UCI BioSci Comparative Physiology Group webpage showing a photo grid of 10 faculty members. The group is part of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.

  • The Comparative Physiology Group in the School of Biological Sciences includes 10 faculty members.
  • Research across this group uses evolutionary and comparative perspectives to understand organismal physiology and evolution of form and function in animals.
  • Faculty study diverse physiological systems beyond biomechanics, including endocrine systems, heat tolerance, and other physiological mechanisms.

Slide 5

Text slide titled "What is Exercise Physiology?" defining exercise physiology as the study of the physiology of physical mechanisms that govern movement and responses to physical activity. Lists four areas of understanding: (1) fundamental physiology of respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems, (2) responses to physical activity, training/detraining, and (3) physiological and structural factors that dictate performance limits. Notes that E183 takes a comparative perspective to understand exercise physiology in an evolutionary context.

Exercise physiology is the study of the physiological mechanisms that govern movement and responses to physical activity. It includes understanding the:

  1. Fundamental physiology of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems
  2. Responses to physical activity, including training and detraining effects
  3. Physiological and structural factors that dictate performance limits
  • In E183, these topics are examined through a comparative perspective, placing human athletic performance into an evolutionary context.
  • The course covers both short-term responses (immediate energy delivery needs) and long-term adaptations (training effects).

Slide 6

Text slide titled "What is Exercise?" explaining that in human kinesiology, a distinction is often made between exercise (planned, voluntary physical activity for recreation or health) and physical activity more broadly. This course does not make that distinction because physiological processes and training effects apply regardless of intent. The distinction is an artifact of modern human lifestyles and doesn't consider evolutionary history. Exercise involves many shared mechanisms across humans and other vertebrates.

  • In human kinesiology, “exercise” is sometimes defined narrowly as planned, voluntary physical activity for recreation or health, as distinct from general physical activity.
  • This course does not make that distinction — daily physical activity is equally important for health and involves the same physiological processes.
  • The narrow definition is an artifact of modern human lifestyles and does not account for evolutionary history.
  • The course uses a broad definition: how humans and other animals respond to the physical demands of movement, including both aerobic and anaerobic energy delivery.

Slide 7

Diagram titled "Exercise Physiology: focus on the pathway of energy delivery and use." Shows an anatomical illustration of the human body with labeled components of the oxygen delivery pathway: alveolar ventilation, alveolar diffusion, circulatory system (cardiac output), circulatory O₂ diffusion, mitochondria (muscle O₂ use), and muscle ATP turnover (neuromechanical output). Arrows trace the pathway from lungs through the cardiovascular system to the muscles.

The course follows the oxygen delivery pathway from environment to tissues:

  1. Alveolar ventilation — moving air into the lungs
  2. Alveolar diffusion — gas exchange across the lung membrane
  3. Circulatory transport — cardiac output carrying O2 in the blood
  4. Circulatory O2 diffusion — delivery of O2 from capillaries to muscle tissue
  5. Mitochondrial O2 use — aerobic metabolism in the muscle
  6. Muscle ATP turnover — conversion to neuromechanical output (movement)
  • Muscles are the only actuators in movement, and muscle physiology is strongly conserved across vertebrates.
  • The course also covers neuromuscular control — how the sensory-motor system interacts with biomechanics to adapt to changing conditions during exercise.

Slide 8

Table titled "Class grading" showing the grade breakdown: In-class participation (2 pts/week x 10 weeks) = 15%, Background reading in Perusall (5 pts/week x 10 weeks) = 15%, Quizzes (12 pts each x 8) = 40% with short answer, and Final (0-60 MCQ, plus short answer) = 30%. Below the table are reminders to read the grading policy, expect approximately 8 quizzes, expect to receive the grade you earn, and notes that instructors will not respond to individual requests for extra credit, additional curving, or anonymous emails about grading.

Grade breakdown

Component Format Percentage
In-class participation 2 pts/week x 10 weeks 15%
Background reading (Perusall) 5 pts/week x 10 weeks 15%
Quizzes 12 pts each x 8 40%
Final exam MCQ + short answer 30%
  • The number of quizzes is approximate; one lowest quiz score is dropped.
  • Students should expect to receive the grade they earn — no additional curving.
  • Instructors will not respond to individual requests for extra credit, grade curving, or anonymous emails about grading.

Slide 9

Screenshot of the Extra Credit Assignment on Canvas, worth 3% of total grade. Due June 5 by 11:59pm, worth 10 points. The assignment asks students to reflect on the benefits of exercise, their current exercise routine, and societal barriers to physical activity. Instructions include: (1) watch a linked video, (2) answer reflection questions, (3) keep an exercise journal for 6 weeks during the quarter, and (4) reflect on barriers to regular exercise.

  • One extra credit assignment is available, worth up to 3% of the total grade.
  • Students log their physical activity over 6 weeks during the quarter and reflect on their exercise habits and barriers to regular physical activity.
  • This is the only extra credit opportunity in the course.

Slide 10

Text slide titled "Academic honesty" listing academic integrity policies: students are responsible for maintaining academic integrity; do not engage in activities to receive grades by means other than honest effort; this includes use of AI tools to answer quiz/exam questions or post comments on background reading; do not aid another student who is attempting to cheat; do not share assessment information on Discord, text/DM, messaging, or other platforms; do not submit participation notecards on behalf of someone else. States that violations will be reported and will lead to a zero score on the assessment in question. Instructors will not provide leniency to anyone found violating academic integrity policies.

  • Students are responsible for maintaining academic integrity in all coursework.
  • Prohibited activities include: using AI tools on assessments, sharing quiz/exam information on any platform (Discord, text, DM), aiding other students in cheating, and submitting participation cards for others.
  • Violations will be reported and result in a zero score on the assessment.

Slide 11

Text slide titled "Considerations on the use and impact of AI" presenting a survey asking students to rate three statements on a 1-5 scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree): (1) I would be tempted to use AI tools for quizzes if they were taken outside of class, (2) I expect that many of my peers would use AI tools for quizzes, even if I did not, (3) There is likely to be less opportunity to use AI tools on quizzes taken in class.

  • An in-class survey gauges student attitudes toward AI tool usage on assessments.
  • The questions address temptation to use AI, expectations about peer behavior, and the effect of in-class vs. out-of-class quiz formats on AI use.

Slide 12

Text slide continuing "Considerations on the use and impact of AI" with three key points: (1) Reliance on AI tools leads to poorer learning outcomes and lower retention, (2) Learning occurs through the process of struggling to understand on your own terms -- there are no shortcuts, (3) AI tools have their place when properly used, but NOT as a shortcut in activities whose sole purpose is learning.

  • Reliance on AI tools leads to poorer learning outcomes and lower retention.
  • Learning occurs through the process of struggling to understand material independently — there are no shortcuts.
  • AI tools have legitimate uses, but not as a shortcut in activities whose sole purpose is learning.

Slide 13

Text slide titled "Quizzes" with logistics: administered in class on Fridays via Canvas, 25 minutes in duration. Make-up quizzes allowed only with confirmed documentation of excused absence. Format includes true/false, MCQs, and problem solving. Question banks ensure every student receives a different quiz. Week 1 is a participation quiz worth full completion credit. One lowest score will be dropped before final grade calculation.

Quiz format

  • Administered in class on Fridays via Canvas, 25 minutes in duration.
  • Format: true/false, multiple-choice questions, and problem solving.
  • Question banks ensure every student receives a different version of the quiz.
  • In place of a quiz in Week 1 there is a Community Expectation Agreement, that counts 1 full quiz credit for completion.
  • Make-up quizzes require confirmed documentation of excused absence, arranged in advance.
  • One lowest quiz score is dropped before final grade calculation.

Slide 14

Text slide titled "Study tips" with a graph showing memory retention over time. The graph illustrates the space repetition effect: after first learning, retention declines, but with repeated review sessions, the rate of decline slows and overall retention improves. Tips listed include: actively engage with material, study regularly with short study bouts, take regular "brain-body breaks," preview the study guide, use "Active Listening" by writing down questions about the topic and listening for answers, take notes on key points rather than verbatim, and come to office hours with specific questions.

Study strategies

  • Spaced repetition improves long-term retention: repeated short study bouts are more effective than cramming. The retention curve shows that each review session slows the rate of memory decline.
  • Active engagement: preview study guide before class, write down 1–2 questions, and listen for answers during lecture.
  • Take selective notes — key concepts and questions for follow-up, not verbatim transcription.
  • Physical activity supports brain function, learning, and retention — take regular “brain-body breaks.”
  • Bring specific questions to office hours.

Slide 15

Text slide titled "Week Overview" listing the Week 1 lecture materials: What is exercise physiology? The power of comparative approaches, Principles of gas exchange, The oxygen supply cascade. Also lists background reading assignments: BioE183 Syllabus, "The Evolution of Locomotor Stamina in Tetrapods: Circumventing a Mechanical Constraint" (Carrier), and "The Oxygen Cascade" (Deranged Physiology).

Week 1 topics

  • What is exercise physiology?
  • The power of comparative approaches
  • Principles of gas exchange
  • The oxygen supply cascade

Background reading

  • BioE183 Syllabus
  • Carrier — “The Evolution of Locomotor Stamina in Tetrapods: Circumventing a Mechanical Constraint”
  • “The Oxygen Cascade” (Deranged Physiology)

Slide 16

Screenshot of the Canvas Materials page for Week 1, showing assignments listed under the Week 1 module: "Making the most of learning with Perusall," "TheOxygenCascadeDerangedPhysiology - Pages 1-9," "The Evolution of Locomotor Stamina," and "E183_Week1_StudyGuide.docx." A note at the bottom explains that due to new ADA compliance regulations, slide PDFs cannot be posted, and instead students will receive weekly study guides and video recordings of lectures.

  • Weekly materials are organized on Canvas with links to Perusall readings, study guides, and video recordings.
  • Background readings must be accessed through Canvas assignment links (not directly through Perusall) for grades to post correctly.
  • After Week 1, the course follows a pattern of two content lectures per week (Monday/Wednesday) plus an interactive Friday session (not recorded).

Slide 17

Text slide titled "Comparative Perspectives in Physiology" with an overview stating "Comparative perspective and thinking about humans in an evolutionary context." Two learning objectives are listed: (1) Appreciate the value of the comparative method, (2) Describe the features of early tetrapods that may have limited locomotor endurance.

Learning objectives

  1. Appreciate the value of the comparative method in physiology.
  2. Describe the features of early tetrapods that may have limited locomotor endurance.
  • The remainder of this lecture shifts from course logistics to the scientific content: understanding humans in an evolutionary context through comparative physiology.

Slide 18

Photo collage titled "Comparative Perspectives in Physiology" featuring diverse animals: wildebeest, iguana, kangaroo, fish, cranes in flight, coiled snake, marine iguana, penguin, honeybee, crab, beetle, shrimp, and others. Central text overlay reads "Many adaptive features of animal structure and function are associated with movement and energy delivery."

  • The diversity of animal body forms reflects adaptations for movement and energy delivery.
  • Physical activity is one of the main drivers of the structural and functional diversity observed among animals.
  • The comparative approach uses this diversity to uncover fundamental principles of physiology and biomechanics.

Slide 19

Same photo collage of diverse animals as previous slide, now with updated central text reading "Much of our fundamental understanding of physiological principles for exercise and locomotor function originated in comparative animal studies."

  • Most fundamental physiological principles taught in human physiology textbooks were originally discovered through comparative animal studies.
  • Many medical and pre-med students are unaware that key discoveries about physiological systems were worked out in non-human species.
  • The comparative approach helps place humans in an evolutionary context, revealing both our exceptional traits and our limitations.

Slide 20

Slide titled "Comparative studies help us understand human biology" with the question "Are humans good athletes?" Below are four photos of exceptional human athletes: Sha'Carri Richardson (100m and 200m sprinter), Kelvin Kiptum (Marathon world record, 2023 Chicago Marathon, 2:00:35), Annie Hughes (Ultramarathoner), and Jacky Hunt-Broersma (104 marathons in 104 days as a transtibial amputee athlete).

  • The question “Are humans good athletes?” is explored through a comparative lens.
  • Examples of exceptional human athletes include:
    • Sha’Carri Richardson — world-class sprinter (100m and 200m)
    • Kelvin Kiptum — marathon world record holder (2:00:35, 2023 Chicago Marathon)
    • Annie Hughes — multiple first-place finishes in 100-mile ultra marathons
    • Jacky Hunt-Broersma — transtibial amputee athlete who ran 104 marathons in 104 days
  • While individual humans can achieve remarkable feats, the average human is not athletically exceptional compared to many other species.

Slide 21

Slide titled "Animal speed records" listing maximum speeds with photos: Cheetah 60-75 mph, Pronghorn 55 mph, Wildebeest 50 mph, Ostrich 45 mph, Horse 44 mph, Dog 43 mph. Notes that the fastest human, Usain Bolt, reached 27.8 mph, and that the lizard Ctenosaura similis (Black Spiny-tailed Iguana) reaches 21 mph. A caption states "It is informative to think about human performance in a comparative context to understand what is possible."

Animal speed records

Animal Top Speed
Cheetah 60–75 mph
Pronghorn 55 mph
Wildebeest 50 mph
Ostrich 45 mph
Horse 44 mph
Dog 43 mph
Usain Bolt (fastest human) 27.8 mph
Ctenosaura similis (lizard) 21 mph
  • Humans are not exceptional in speed — Usain Bolt cannot outrun any of the listed animals, and some lizards approach his top speed.
  • However, humans are exceptional in endurance, particularly in hot conditions, due to superior heat-dissipating capacity (sweating, lack of fur).
  • Horses and dogs can match human endurance distances in cold weather, but not in heat.
  • Comparative context reveals what is physically possible across the diversity of animal solutions.

Slide 22

Slide titled "The Krogh Principle" featuring a black-and-white portrait photo of August Krogh (1874-1949, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1920). Two quotes are displayed: (1) "For a large number of problems there will be some animal of choice, or a few such animals, on which it can be most conveniently studied" (Krogh, 1929, restated by Krebs, 1975), and (2) "A unifying theory of living things will be obtained only when we study the vital functions in all their aspects throughout all the myriad of organisms." The slide concludes: "Comparative studies reveal the evolutionary possibilities!"

The Krogh Principle

“For a large number of problems there will be some animal of choice, or a few such animals, on which it can be most conveniently studied.” — Krogh (1929)

  • August Krogh (1874–1949) received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1920).
  • The principle states that for any physiological question, certain species are especially well-suited for study — either because they have exceptional performance in a particular trait or because their anatomy allows measurements not feasible in other species.
  • Example: early studies on lung function and cardiorespiratory physiology were done in turtles, whose hard shell made certain measurements possible.
  • Comparative studies reveal the evolutionary possibilities and contribute to a unifying understanding of living systems.

Slide 23

Text slide titled "Two main comparative approaches:" listing: (1) "Case studies" or "model species," and (2) Examine functional diversity and variation among species within evolutionary lineages. Reference: Garland and Carter (1994) Annual Review of Physiology.

Two main comparative approaches

  1. “Case studies” or “model species” — study individual species with exceptional traits or unique experimental accessibility.
  2. Evolutionary approaches — examine functional diversity and variation among species within evolutionary lineages.
  • Reference: Garland and Carter (1994) Annual Review of Physiology.

Slide 24

Expanded version of the "Two main comparative approaches" slide now showing details under each approach. (1) "Case studies" or "model species": Study specific animals that allow techniques not feasible in others, or that are especially well-adapted for a specific function to increase "signal to noise" in understanding adaptation. Sub-questions: How do organisms work? What factors limit performance? (2) Examine functional diversity and variation among species within evolutionary lineages. Reference: Garland and Carter (1994) Annu. Rev. Physiol.

Approach 1 — Model species:

  • Study specific animals that allow techniques not feasible in others, or that are especially well-adapted for a function to increase the “signal to noise” in understanding adaptation.
  • Key questions: How do organisms work? What factors limit performance?

Approach 2 — Evolutionary diversity:

  • Examine how physiological traits vary across related species within evolutionary lineages.
  • While case studies reveal mechanisms, they don’t capture the full picture of how diversity and evolution shape different solutions.

Slide 25

Slide titled "What factors limit performance?" featuring a photo of a wildebeest and two graphs. Text explains that wildebeest travel 20-40 km between drinking events, travel 60-80 km during migration, and face average daily temperatures above 34 degrees Celsius (100 degrees Fahrenheit) in 9 out of 12 months. Graphs compare muscle efficiency between wildebeest and cow, showing wildebeest muscle has higher efficiency. Caption states: "If wildebeest completed the same muscle work with cow efficiency, water loss would be 50% greater." Reference: Curtis et al. (2018) Remarkable muscles, remarkable locomotion in desert-dwelling wildebeest, Nature.

Case study: Wildebeest muscle efficiency

  • Wildebeest are adapted to hot desert environments and travel 20–40 km between drinking events (60–80 km during migration), with average daily temperatures exceeding 34°C (100°F) for 9 out of 12 months.
  • Researchers tracked wildebeest with collars, took muscle biopsies via helicopter blow-darting, and measured muscle performance in a field lab.
  • Wildebeest muscle has significantly higher efficiency than cow muscle.
  • Higher efficiency means lower heat waste and lower water loss — if wildebeest had cow-level muscle efficiency, their water loss would be 50% greater.
  • This illustrates integrated function: muscle efficiency directly impacts water balance, thermoregulation, and endurance capacity.
  • Reference: Curtis et al. (2018) Nature.

Slide 26

Slide titled "What are the fundamental demands of bipedal locomotion?" with a quote from Julia Clarke and Kevin Middleton (2006): "Birds are like our doppelgangers perched on another branch of the tree of life. Many of their qualities -- including complex behavior, bipedality, endothermic, and a highly visual nature -- verge on those of humans while refracted through their fiery exterior." Below lists key facts: approximately 9,500 species (most diverse terrestrial vertebrates), 2,500-fold range of body mass, bipedal gaits include walk, run, hop, and skip, and diverse leg proportions and locomotor ecology. Photos show various bird species walking and running.

Case study: Bipedal locomotion in birds

  • Birds share key traits with humans: bipedality, endothermy, complex behavior, and highly visual nature.
  • Birds have a 250-million-year evolutionary legacy of bipedalism, compared to approximately 10 million years for humans.
  • They are the most diverse terrestrial vertebrates: ~9,500 species spanning a 2,500-fold range of body mass.
  • Birds use all physically possible bipedal gaits: walking, running, hopping, and skipping.
  • Their diverse leg proportions and locomotor ecologies make them valuable for studying the fundamental demands of bipedal movement.

Slide 27

Slide titled "What are the fundamental demands of bipedal locomotion?" showing a photo grid of various bird species alongside humans. Images include researchers walking with ostriches, a person next to a large bird, ostriches running, and a toddler walking alongside an ostrich, illustrating the parallels between human and bird bipedalism.

  • The ostrich is the fastest biped on the planet (45 mph) and uses the same walking and running gaits as humans.
  • From still images alone, one can distinguish walking from running in both humans and ostriches — this is because both species use fundamentally similar physical mechanisms (e.g., inverted pendulum in walking, spring-mass in running) despite completely different evolutionary histories.
  • This represents convergent evolution in locomotor mechanics.

Slide 28

Slide titled "Similar movement strategies, despite different morphology and development." Shows four photos comparing a human toddler learning to walk with baby and adult ostriches. The toddler takes unsteady steps while the young ostrich runs confidently, illustrating that ostriches can walk and run like adults from 24 hours after hatching while human children require hundreds of thousands of practice steps.

  • Despite using similar adult gaits, humans and ostriches have fundamentally different development.
  • Ostriches can walk and run like adults within 24 hours of hatching (precocial development).
  • Human infants require hundreds of thousands of practice steps before achieving stable walking (altricial development).
  • Yet both species converge on similar locomotor solutions as adults — a fascinating example of different developmental paths reaching similar functional outcomes.

Slide 29

Expanded "Two main comparative approaches" slide now showing full detail for both approaches. Under approach 2, additional questions are listed: Are physiological differences among species adaptive? How do physiological traits evolve? Do unrelated species converge on similar adaptive features for specific functions? Reference: Garland and Carter (1994) Annu. Rev. Physiol.

Approach 2 — Evolutionary diversity (expanded):

Key questions addressed by evolutionary comparative studies:

  • Are physiological differences among species adaptive?
  • How do physiological traits evolve?
  • Do unrelated species converge on similar adaptive features for specific functions?

  • The bird/human bipedalism example illustrates convergent evolution — two unrelated lineages arriving at similar locomotor solutions.

Slide 30

Phylogenetic tree diagram titled "Diversity of animal form and function reflects both adaptation and evolutionary history." The tree shows the evolutionary relationships from aquatic locomotion (ancestral sarcopterygian fish using paired fins and lateral body undulation) through the transition to tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). A highlighted box asks "Why is this important?" and answers: "Evolution 'tinkers' with what is there; it doesn't reinvent from scratch." Illustrations of representative species appear at the branch tips.

Evolutionary context: From fish to tetrapods

  • All tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) share a common ancestor: a sarcopterygian fish that used paired fins and lateral body undulation for aquatic locomotion.
  • Evolution tinkers with existing structures — it does not reinvent from scratch. Despite hundreds of millions of years of evolution, tetrapods retain anatomical features and physiological mechanisms inherited from this aquatic ancestor.
  • This means that some features of human physiology reflect evolutionary constraints inherited from ancestors adapted to a completely different environment.

Slide 31

Table titled "Movement in water vs air" comparing physical properties of air and water. Columns show Air, Water, and Ratio values for: Density (g/cm³): 0.0012 vs 1 (ratio 830), Dynamic Viscosity (Pa·s): 18 x 10⁻⁶ vs 1 x 10⁻³ (ratio 55), Oxygen content (mL O₂/L): 209 vs 7 (ratio 30), Heat capacity (kJ/L·°C): 0.31 vs 3200 (ratio approximately 10,000). Side images show a fish (aquatic), a bird in flight (aerial), and a horse running (terrestrial).

Physical properties: Air vs. water

Property Air Water Ratio
Density (g/cm3) 0.0012 1 830x
Dynamic viscosity (Pa·s) 18 x 10-6 1 x 10-3 55x
O2 content (mL O2/L) 209 7 30x
Heat capacity (kJ/L·°C) 0.31 3200 ~10,000x
  • These differences profoundly influence the forces, energy demands, oxygen supply, and thermoregulation requirements of movement in each medium.
  • Air contains 30 times more oxygen than water per unit volume.
  • Water is 830 times denser than air, which affects drag and buoyancy.

Slide 32

Text slide titled "Movement in water vs air" explaining how forces involved in locomotion depend on the environmental medium. Lists three categories: Aquatic -- inertial and drag forces, with buoyancy supporting body weight. Terrestrial -- gravity and inertia, with air resistance being low. Aerial -- gravity, inertia, and drag are all significant because flying animals move at higher speeds. Photos illustrate each mode: a dolphin swimming, a polar bear walking, and a bird in flight.

Forces by locomotor mode

  • Aquatic — Major forces are inertial and drag forces; buoyancy supports body weight, so no muscular effort is needed to resist gravity.
  • Terrestrial — Gravity and inertia are the dominant forces; air resistance is typically low at terrestrial speeds.
  • Aerial — Gravity, inertia, and drag are all significant because flying animals move at higher speeds where air resistance becomes substantial.

Slide 33

Log-log scatter plot titled "Energetic cost of transport (CoT) of swimming, flying, running" showing body mass (x-axis) versus cost of transport (y-axis) for hundreds of species. Three regression lines show that running is the most costly mode of locomotion, flying is intermediate, and swimming is the least costly. The cost of transport is defined as energy per unit mass per unit distance (J/kg·m). Reference: Tucker (1975), Schmidt-Nielsen (1972).

Energetic cost of transport (CoT)

  • Cost of transport measures the energy required to move a unit of body mass over a unit of distance (J/kg·m). It allows comparison of locomotor efficiency across species and locomotor modes.
  • On a log-log plot of body mass vs. CoT:
    • Running is the most energetically costly mode
    • Flying is intermediate
    • Swimming is the least costly
  • Running is expensive because of gravity and collisional energy losses each time a limb strikes the ground.
  • Swimming is cheap because buoyancy supports body weight, eliminating the cost of resisting gravity.
  • Flying animals move faster, so despite drag costs, the energy per unit distance is lower than running.
  • References: Tucker (1975), Schmidt-Nielsen (1972).

Slide 34

Phylogenetic tree diagram similar to Slide 30 but with additional annotation. A red arrow highlights the transition from aquatic sarcopterygian fish to early tetrapods, with the question "How did ancestral tetrapods move and breathe on land?" The tree shows the evolutionary divergence into amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.

  • A central evolutionary question: How did ancestral tetrapods move and breathe on land?
  • The transition from aquatic to terrestrial locomotion required fundamental changes in both the mechanics of movement and the mechanics of breathing.
  • The inherited body plan from aquatic ancestors created constraints that influenced how early land animals could move and ventilate simultaneously.

Slide 35

Slide titled "Features of early tetrapod locomotion" with two columns. Left shows "Early tetrapods (Devonian period)" with illustrations of four-legged animals with sprawling posture and an underlying fish-like body form. Right shows "Modern lizards" with a diagram and photo of a lizard demonstrating lateral body undulation during locomotion, bending their backs from side to side as they run.

Early tetrapod locomotion

  • Early tetrapods (Devonian period) had a body plan resembling a fish with legs — sprawling posture with lateral body undulation for propulsion.
  • Modern lizards retain this ancestral locomotor pattern: they bend their trunk from side to side during locomotion, similar to how a fish undulates in water.
  • This lateral bending engages the trunk muscles — the same muscles required for breathing.

Slide 36

Slide titled "Features of early tetrapod locomotion" showing anatomical drawings from Carrier (1991) "Conflict in the Hypaxial Musculo-Skeletal System: Documenting an Evolutionary Constraint." Left panel shows four skeletal views of a lizard in different phases of lateral undulation during locomotion. Right panel shows a diagram of the trunk musculature and ribcage, illustrating how the intercostal muscles used for breathing are also engaged during locomotion.

Mechanical conflict: locomotion vs. breathing

  • In sprawling tetrapods, the intercostal muscles and abdominal muscles serve dual roles: powering breathing (ventilation) and stabilizing/bending the trunk during locomotion.
  • Early tetrapods lacked a diaphragm — a structure unique to mammals — so they relied entirely on these trunk muscles for ventilation.
  • This creates a fundamental mechanical constraint: the same muscles cannot efficiently serve both locomotion and breathing simultaneously.
  • Reference: Carrier (1991) “Conflict in the Hypaxial Musculo-Skeletal System.” American Zoologist 31, 644–654.

Slide 37

Slide titled "Mechanical interference between running and breathing in lizards" from Carrier (1991). Top panel shows a breathing trace with large, regular tidal volume peaks during rest. Bottom right shows a graph plotting tidal volume (y-axis, in cm³) against belt speed (x-axis, in m/sec) with error bars. As treadmill speed increases from 0 to 0.8 m/s, tidal volume decreases from approximately 4 cm³ to about 1.5 cm³, demonstrating that breathing becomes impaired during locomotion.

Evidence: Tidal volume decreases with locomotion in lizards

  • At rest, lizards show large, regular tidal volumes.
  • As treadmill speed increases (0 to 0.8 m/s), tidal volume decreases from ~4 cm3 to ~1.5 cm3.
  • This is the opposite of what would be expected — tidal volume should increase with exercise to meet higher metabolic demands.
  • The decrease demonstrates that locomotion mechanically impairs breathing in sprawling tetrapods.
  • Reference: Carrier (1991).

Slide 38

Slide titled "Mechanical interference between running and breathing in lizards" showing a follow-up study by Wang, Carrier, and Hicks (1997) on ventilation and gas exchange in lizards during treadmill exercise. Data traces show low tidal volumes and erratic, high-frequency breathing during exercise, consistent with mechanical conflict between locomotion and ventilation.

  • Follow-up study by Wang, Carrier, and Hicks (1997) confirmed these findings.
  • During treadmill exercise, lizards show low tidal volumes and erratic, high-frequency breathing.
  • This pattern is consistent with a mechanical conflict between locomotion and ventilation — the trunk muscles cannot serve both functions effectively at the same time.
  • Reference: Wang, Carrier, Hicks (1997) J. Exp. Biol. 200, 2629–2639.

Slide 39

Slide titled "Intercostal muscles stabilize the trunk during locomotion" showing electromyography (EMG) data from Carrier (1991). Left panel (highlighted in yellow) shows EMG recordings of left and right intercostal muscles and tidal volume during locomotion -- the intercostal muscles fire rhythmically with each locomotor stride. Right panel shows EMG recordings during resting, where external and internal intercostal muscles fire only during breathing cycles. A diagram of a lizard on a treadmill and a skeleton illustration show the experimental setup.

EMG evidence for dual muscle function

  • Electromyography (EMG) recordings from Carrier (1991) demonstrate the mechanical conflict directly:
    • At rest: intercostal muscles fire only during breathing cycles (ventilatory function).
    • During locomotion: the same intercostal muscles fire rhythmically with each stride (trunk stabilization function), overriding their ventilatory role.
  • This confirms that intercostal muscles are recruited for trunk stabilization during locomotion, compromising their ability to power breathing.

Slide 40

Summary slide titled "Features of early tetrapod locomotion" listing key characteristics: sprawling posture, lateral bending of trunk during locomotion, relatively massive distal limbs, same muscles used for ventilation and trunk stabilization leading to mechanical interference between running and breathing, resulting in limited aerobic scope and endurance in locomotion. Anatomical illustrations show the skeletal structure and lateral trunk bending of early tetrapods.

Summary: Early tetrapod locomotion

Key features inherited from the aquatic ancestor:

  • Sprawling posture with lateral bending of the trunk during locomotion
  • Relatively massive distal limbs
  • Same muscles (intercostal, hypaxial) used for both ventilation and trunk stabilization
  • Mechanical interference between running and breathing
  • Result: limited aerobic scope and endurance in locomotion

Slide 41

Phylogenetic tree diagram showing the evolution from aquatic sarcopterygian fish to tetrapods, now annotated with key features. At the base of the tetrapod clade: "Ancestral tetrapods used lateral body undulation coupled with limb motion." Further annotation reads: "Used costal (rib cage) breathing powered by hypaxial body wall muscles; limited aerobic scope and endurance in locomotion."

  • Ancestral tetrapods used lateral body undulation coupled with limb motion — inherited from their fish ancestor.
  • They used costal (rib cage) breathing powered by hypaxial body wall muscles.
  • This combination led to limited aerobic scope and endurance in locomotion.
  • Two lineages — mammals and birds — independently evolved features that overcame this ancestral constraint (to be discussed in subsequent lectures).

Slide 42

Phylogenetic tree diagram with additional annotations highlighting the groups with "Athletic animals: high aerobic scope, speed and/or endurance." Red highlights mark specific lineages among mammals and birds that have evolved enhanced locomotor performance. Illustrations show athletic animals including horses, cheetahs, ostriches, and other fast-running species at the tips of these branches.

  • Certain lineages within mammals and birds have evolved to become highly athletic animals with high aerobic scope, speed, and/or endurance.
  • These lineages independently evolved solutions to the ancestral constraint on simultaneous running and breathing:
    • Mammals evolved the diaphragm and erect posture, decoupling trunk bending from locomotion.
    • Birds evolved a rigid trunk with a flow-through lung system.
  • The phylogenetic distribution of athletic performance reflects both adaptation and evolutionary history.

Slide 43

Summary slide with three bullet points: (1) Many features of animal morphology and physiology (form and function) reflect adaptation for movement and energy delivery to tissues, (2) The comparative approach provides insight into fundamental mechanisms of how animals work, (3) The comparative approach provides evolutionary context to understand adaptive features and performance limits.

Lecture 1 — Key takeaways

  1. Many features of animal morphology and physiology (form and function) reflect adaptation for movement and energy delivery to tissues.
  2. The comparative approach provides insight into fundamental mechanisms — how animals work.
  3. The comparative approach provides evolutionary context to understand adaptive features and performance limits.

Glossary of Key Terms

Term Definition
Exercise physiology The study of the physiological mechanisms that govern movement and responses to physical activity, including the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems.
Comparative approach A research framework that studies physiological and biomechanical principles across multiple species to understand fundamental mechanisms and evolutionary adaptations.
Krogh Principle The principle that for any given physiological problem, there exists an ideal animal species on which it can be most conveniently studied (Krogh, 1929).
Cost of transport (CoT) The energy required to move a unit of body mass over a unit of distance (J/kg·m), used to compare locomotor efficiency across species and locomotor modes.
Tetrapod A vertebrate animal with four limbs (or descended from four-limbed ancestors), including amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.
Sarcopterygian fish Lobe-finned fish; the common aquatic ancestor of all tetrapods, which used paired fins and lateral body undulation for locomotion.
Lateral body undulation A locomotor pattern in which the trunk bends side-to-side during movement, inherited from aquatic ancestors and retained in modern lizards and salamanders.
Sprawling posture A limb configuration in which the legs extend laterally from the body (as in lizards), as opposed to the erect posture of mammals and birds.
Hypaxial muscles The muscles of the body wall below the vertebral column (including intercostals and abdominals) that are used for both ventilation and trunk stabilization during locomotion.
Mechanical constraint A physical limitation arising from the dual use of trunk muscles for both breathing and locomotion in sprawling tetrapods, limiting simultaneous aerobic capacity.
Convergent evolution The independent evolution of similar features or functions in unrelated lineages — e.g., bipedal locomotion in humans and birds.
Aerobic scope The range between resting and maximal aerobic metabolic rate; a measure of an animal’s capacity for sustained physical activity.
Precocial development A developmental pattern in which offspring are relatively mature and mobile shortly after birth or hatching (e.g., ostriches).
Altricial development A developmental pattern in which offspring are relatively immature and dependent at birth, requiring extended periods of parental care and practice to develop motor skills (e.g., humans).
Diaphragm A dome-shaped muscle unique to mammals that separates the thoracic and abdominal cavities and is the primary muscle of breathing, enabling ventilation independent of trunk locomotion.