Muscle Function and Energetics of Locomotion — Equations
← Back to home
A consolidated reference of the equations used across Weeks 5–8 for muscle mechanics, musculoskeletal lever systems, the energetics of locomotion, and body-size scaling. Please see lecture notes on the units, and carefully check your work for consistency of units when solving problems.
Muscle force, length, and velocity
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $F_{max} = F_{active} + F_{passive}$ |
Total isometric force |
Measured force during maximally stimulated isometric contraction is the sum of active (cross-bridge) force and passive (titin + connective tissue) force. |
| $F_{active} = F_{max} - F_{passive}$ |
Active force |
Active force is computed by subtracting separately measured passive force from the total; used to construct the active F–L curve point-by-point. |
| $(V + b)(F + a) = b(F_0 + a)$ |
Hill force–velocity equation |
The classic hyperbolic relation between shortening velocity $V$ and load $F$. $F_0$ = maximum isometric tension (at $V = 0$); $V_0$ = maximum shortening velocity (at $F = 0$); $a$ = heat-of-shortening coefficient; $b = a(V_0/F_0)$. |
| $P = F \cdot V$ |
Mechanical power |
Instantaneous power output; computed point-by-point from the F–V curve. Peak power occurs at intermediate force and velocity (~0.2–0.3 $V_{max}$). |
| $F_{tot} = F_{FV} \cdot F_{FL} \cdot F_{act}$ |
Combined muscle model |
Standard multiplicative muscle model (e.g., OpenSim): total force is the product of velocity-, length-, and activation-dependent factors. |
Muscle architecture and scaling
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $\sigma = F / \text{PCSA}$ |
Specific tension (stress) |
Force normalized by physiological cross-sectional area; ~18–30 N/cm² across vertebrate skeletal muscle, used to compare intrinsic capability across muscles. |
| $F_{max} = \text{PCSA} \times \sigma_{spec}$ |
Maximum isometric muscle force |
Maximum force a muscle can produce equals its PCSA times specific tension; PCSA = muscle volume / fiber length. |
| $\text{PCSA} = \dfrac{\text{Volume}}{\text{fiber length}}$ |
Physiological cross-sectional area |
Cross-section of muscle perpendicular to the fibers; determines maximum force capacity (proportional to sarcomeres in parallel). |
| $F_{max} \propto \text{PCSA}$ |
Force capacity scaling |
Maximum force is proportional to the number of sarcomeres in parallel — i.e., the PCSA. |
| $\text{Displacement}, V_{max} \propto L_{fiber}$ |
Displacement and velocity capacity |
Maximum shortening distance and maximum shortening velocity are proportional to the number of sarcomeres in series — i.e., the fiber length. |
| $\text{Work}, P \propto \text{Volume} = \text{PCSA} \times L_{fiber}$ |
Work and power capacity |
Maximum work and power are proportional to muscle volume (or, equivalently, mass via conserved muscle density ~1.06 g/cm³). |
| $V_{myofibril} + V_{SR} + V_{Mt} \approx 1$ |
Cellular volume-fraction constraint |
The sum of myofibrillar, SR, and mitochondrial volume fractions is constrained within a fixed muscle-cell volume; high specialization in one component comes at the expense of the others. |
Lever systems and effective mechanical advantage
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $T = F \times D$ |
Torque |
Rotational effect of a force around a fulcrum, where $D$ is the perpendicular distance from the force’s line of action to the fulcrum. |
| $F_1 D_1 = F_2 D_2$ |
Lever balance |
Torques on either side of a fulcrum balance at equilibrium. |
| $F_{muscle} = F_g \times \dfrac{R}{r}$ |
Limb lever equation |
Muscle force required to resist the ground reaction force, where $r$ is the muscle moment arm (skeletal morphology) and $R$ is the GRF moment arm (set by posture). |
| $\text{EMA} = r / R$ |
Effective mechanical advantage |
Ratio of muscle moment arm to GRF moment arm. Higher EMA → lower required muscle force per unit body weight; scales positively with body mass across vertebrates. |
| $T_h = F_g \times R_h$ |
Joint torque (inverse dynamics) |
Torque at a joint from the GRF and its moment arm to that joint. |
| $W_h = T_h \times \Delta\theta$ |
Joint work |
Net work at a joint, computed by integrating joint torque through joint angular displacement. |
Work loops and energy cycling
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $W = \oint F \, dL$ |
Work loop (net mechanical work) |
Net work done by a muscle equals the area enclosed by its force–length trajectory over a contraction cycle. Counterclockwise = positive (motor), clockwise = negative (brake), no enclosed area = strut/spring. |
| $L_{\text{MTU}} = L_{\text{CE}} + L_{\text{SEE}}$ |
Muscle-tendon unit length partition |
At every instant, MTU length equals the sum of contractile-element (fascicle) length and series-elastic-element (tendon) length. |
| $F_{\text{CE}} = F_{\text{SEE}}$ |
Series-element force balance |
In a series arrangement, the contractile element and tendon transmit the same force at every instant. |
| $F_{\text{SEE}} = k_{\text{tendon}} \cdot \Delta L_{\text{SEE}}$ |
Tendon stiffness relationship |
Tendon force is approximately proportional to tendon stretch over the operating range; stiffness $k$ increases with tendon cross-sectional area. |
| $\tau_{exo} = k_{rot} \times \Delta\theta_{ank}$ |
Exoskeleton torque |
Passive elastic torque produced by an ankle exoskeleton, with rotational stiffness $k_{rot}$. |
Forces and dynamics of locomotion
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $\sum F_{vertical} = Mg + F_{legs} = 0$ |
Vertical force balance |
Average vertical force from the legs equals body weight across an integer number of strides. |
| $F_{avg}/W_b = T_{step}/T_c = L_{step}/L_c$ |
Weyand step-cycle equation |
Predicts average vertical GRF (in body weights) from the ratio of step duration to stance duration. |
| $F_{peak} \propto 1/t_c$ |
Peak force vs. contact time |
As speed rises, contact time shrinks and peak vertical GRF must rise to maintain weight support. |
| $\text{COM work} \propto s^4$ |
Kuo step-length scaling |
Center-of-mass work rate at step transitions scales approximately as the fourth power of step length. |
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| $\dot{V}O_2 = \dot{V}_E (F_IO_2 - F_EO_2)$ |
Fick principle (respirometry) |
Oxygen consumption equals ventilation rate times the difference between inspired and expired O2 fractions; the basis of indirect calorimetry. |
| $\text{CoT} = \dot{V}O_2 / \text{speed}$ |
Mass-specific cost of transport |
Energy used per unit distance traveled, per unit body mass (mL O2 kg⁻¹ m⁻¹ or J kg⁻¹ m⁻¹). |
| $\dot{E}_{\text{metab}}/W_b = C \cdot (1/T_c)$ |
Kram & Taylor metabolic rate equation |
Mass-specific metabolic rate per body weight equals the cost coefficient $C$ divided by stance contact time $T_c$; $C \approx 0.189$ J/N is nearly constant across mammals. |
| $E_{\text{cot}}/W_b = C \cdot (1/L_c)$ |
Kram & Taylor cost-of-transport equation |
CoT per body weight equals the cost coefficient $C$ divided by step length $L_c$; larger animals have longer $L_c$, so lower CoT. |
| $1 \text{ mL } O_2 \approx 20.1 \text{ J}$ |
Oxycaloric coefficient |
Average energetic equivalent of aerobic oxygen consumption; converts respirometry data to joules. |
Body-size scaling
| Equation |
Name |
Purpose |
| Strength $\propto L^2$, Mass $\propto L^3$ |
Isometric scaling |
Under geometric similarity, strength (proportional to muscle cross-section) grows with the square of linear dimension, while mass grows with the cube — larger animals are relatively weaker. |
| $\text{CoT} \propto M_b^{-0.25}$ |
CoT vs. body mass scaling |
Across runners, mass-specific cost of transport decreases as body mass to the −0.25 power on log-log axes (Taylor et al. 1970). |
| $\text{fAS} = \dot{V}O_{2max} / \text{BMR}$ |
Factorial aerobic scope |
Ratio of maximum to baseline metabolic rate; athletic species sit on a separate scaling line 2–4× higher than non-athletic species. |
| $\text{fAS}_{athl} = 17.66 \cdot M_b^{0.184}$ |
Athletic-species fAS scaling |
Allometric fit for athletic mammals (Weibel et al.); aerobic scope rises with body mass even within the athletic group. |
| $\text{fAS}_{nonathl} = 8.29 \cdot M_b^{0.100}$ |
Non-athletic-species fAS scaling |
Companion fit for non-athletic mammals; lower intercept and shallower slope. |